chicago land clearance commission blight definition

However the Highland culture, ancient and proud, was fiercely independent and rooted in incredibly important traditions of family and fealty. Southern Scots saw themselves as more modern and progressive, with more in common in language and culture with their southern, English neighbours. Those people in the south now identified more with their southern counterparts than with the old clan culture of the highlands and islands. There was an idea of the Highland culture and way of life being ‘backward’ and ‘old-fashioned’, out of step with the rest of Scotland and the recently United Kingdom. It is still considered a stain on the history of the Scottish people and is also a main contributing factor for the relatively enormous world-wide Scottish diaspora.īy the mid 1800s there was a tangible North-South divide within Scotland.

114, 59 N.E.2d 18, holding that slum clearance is a public purpose, which is not defeated by the fact that redevelopment is done by private parties pursuant to a legislative fiat.The Highland Clearances remain a controversial period in Scotland’s history and are still talked of with great bitterness, particularly by those families who were dispossessed of their land and even, to a large extent, of their culture, over the period of around 100 years between the mid 18th and 19th centuries. The only possible inference is that this multiplicity of litigation has been employed as a delaying tactic with little or no hope of success. The instant appellants, or one of them, have been parties to three actions before the Illinois Supreme Court, two applications to the United States Supreme Court, and the present action is their second application to the District Court raising identical constitutional questions. After the Commission filed its condemnation proceeding a rash of litigation ensued. It was first challenged as an unlawful delegation of legislative power. The constitutionality of the Blighted Areas Act has been repeatedly attacked and upheld during some six years of litigation in both state and federal courts.

Then, too, the litigious nature of this action is readily apparent. Furthermore, appellants' argument is refuted by the Stratton case, on which they place their principal reliance. Counsel for appellants participated in the mandamus application in the Robinette case, supra. What has been said adequately supports appellees' contention that the appeal is frivolous. Thus it is seen that the Supreme Court has refused to entertain an application to review the questions which appellants have attempted to present by this action. 699, the Supreme Court denied motions for leave to file petitions for a writ of mandamus to compel Judge Campbell to expunge his order of dismissal and to convene a three judge court to decide the cause. This action was dismissed by Judge Campbell for want of a substantial federal question. seeking to restrain enforcement of the Act on the ground that it denies plaintiffs their rights guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment. Chicago Land Clearance Commission, D.C.N.D.Ill., 115 F.Supp. One of the appellants was plaintiff in Robinette v.

23, the Illinois Supreme Court sustained the validity of the condemnation judgment over the allegation of the parties, including appellants, that the Act is unconstitutional. Appellants have attacked this Statute repeatedly.

Chicago land clearance commission blight definition